They in fact stated in their own white papers the need for another catastrophic and catalysing event like a “new Pearl Harbour”. Only when you break the left/right paradigm and come to the realisation that the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan and the whole fake, and not to mention contradictory, war on terror was the desired outcome for the neo-conservatives within the Bush administration and the whole military industrial complex. Problem – manufacture a crisis or take advantage of one already in place in order to get the desired Reaction of public outcry whereby the public demands a Solution which has been predetermined from the beginning. You could say that in terms of controlling the masses, and society in general, it’s deployment has been an effective tool in keeping humanity in check.Īlmost all major events in history employ the Hegelian Dialectic of: It has been widely used by our governments and corporations around the world. Most of us unwittingly fall victim to it all too often and sadly if we don’t stop, we will continue to lose our free will and liberties. This in particular will become more apparent as the election draws near.Īnother form of the Hegelian Dialectic is Problem – Reaction – Solution. Nothing is said or done about the issues that neither left or right is discussing. The only real debate that occurs is just the minor differences between those two parties. Good / Evil, Right / Wrong, Left / Right.įor example when people are talking about 2 political parties, Labor or Liberal, Republican or Democrat, what they’re actually referring to, without realising it, is the thesis and the antithesis based off the Hegelian Dialectic. To put it simply, the basis of Hegelianism dictates that the human mind can’t understand anything unless it can be split into two polar opposites. His method of arriving at the truth by the exchange of logical arguments is a system of thought process still in use to this day. For this reason, among others, the entire concept has a topicality to this day as hardly any other methodology of philosophy does.What exactly is the Hegelian Dialectic? Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel was a 19th century German philosopher who devised a particular dialectic, or, method of argument for resolving disagreements. Marx and Engels, for example, had literally turned Hegel upside down by relating the method of dialectics not to an idealism (i.e., the development of ideas) but to concrete material conditions that reveal themselves in reality in the class struggle. It is not necessary to identify as a Hegelian to support the concept of the dialectical three-step. These, in turn, are the basis for further progression, insofar as no one would seriously doubt that children should work in mines, which, frighteningly, is still the case in parts of the world. One can see this, among other things, in societal paradigm shifts.įor example, if as a society we have moved away from the idea that children are good miners because of their size, this has resulted from the antithesis of workers' or children's rights, which are also based on an idea that in turn comes from an ideal and manifests itself in laws. The "Phenomenlogy of Spirit" thus describes an attempt to take a snapshot of certain phenomena within the dialectical rule of three described above. Hegel was much more concerned with the development of the so-called "world spirit" - a somewhat poetic formulation of a historically optimistic idealism - and how it changes in the form of a progression and approaches its final ideal. This is, of course, nevertheless a highly simplified abridgement of the methodology referred to by the technical term "dialectic." But it seems useful to emphasize that this is not about discourse analysis or simple pro and con juxtapositions familiar from the formal didactics of an essay. Hegel nevertheless used this logical model as a backbone to accompany his points in many of his works. However, he never used the word "sythesis" as a synonym. On the other hand, Hegel certainly used a three-valued logical model very similar to the antithesis model, but Hegel's most common terms were: Abstract-Negative-Concrete, where "Aufhebung" means the point of hinging on the concrete. However, continuing Kant's work, it was the German philosopher Fichte who greatly developed and popularized the synthesis model. Hegel attributed this terminology to Kant. Although this model is often named after Hegel, he never used this specific formulation. Hegel's dialectic is usually presented in three stages of development: a thesis that leads to its reaction an antithesis that contradicts or negates the thesis and the tension between the two is resolved by a synthesis.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |